Civics & Public Process · Capstone brief
CIV-04 · Testimony that could be read into the record
Write public comment or testimony on a real, currently open matter — a pending bill, a public hearing, or an open comment period — built entirely on sources you can produce on request.
The question
Write public comment or testimony on a real, currently open matter — a pending bill, a public hearing, or an open comment period — built entirely on sources you can produce on request.
Primary sources / materials
One real, currently open opportunity for public input (a legislative bill in committee accepting public comment, a public hearing with a published agenda, or a federal or state agency's open comment period — — a link to the specific open comment opportunity used, findable via the federal rulemaking portal (https://www.regulations.gov) or the relevant legislature/agency's own public-comment page). The matter's own primary documents (the bill text, the proposed rule, the hearing agenda). A draft of testimony or comment written to that body's actual submission format and length limits, where published.
Expected failure modes
Writing generic opinion writing that never engages the specific matter's actual text. Making a factual claim about the matter's effects with no source. Ignoring the body's own format/length rules when they are published.
Done looks like
Identification of the specific matter and comment opportunity with a link; testimony/comment draft that cites its own factual claims; a short note on whether and how the student would actually submit it (even if they choose not to submit).
Five C's
CT: persuasion built on cited fact, not assertion. CR: every factual claim traceable to a real source. CO: peer checks one factual claim in the draft against its cited source. CM: testimony/comment draft. CZ: people affected by the matter, including those the student disagrees with.
Mentor role
Government/civics teacher reviews the draft for factual sourcing before it is considered "done." Standing instruction: reject any claim the student cannot source. School-supervised. Actual submission, if it happens, is a personal choice made with a parent/guardian — not a class requirement.
Rubric calibration
R1: one matter, one testimony/comment. R2: factual claims sourced. R3: format matches the body's actual submission process where published. R4: at least one likely counterargument acknowledged. R5: testimony readable and persuasive to someone outside the class.
Two ways this goes wrong
(a) Generic opinion writing that could apply to any bill on the topic. (b) A statistic in the testimony that traces back to nothing.
Checkpoint suggestions
- Week 1: Matter and comment opportunity selected and confirmed open/real by teacher.
- Week 2: Source documents gathered; factual claims drafted with citations.
- Week 3: Testimony/comment drafted to the body's format; mentor fact-check pass.
Credit lane fit
Lane A immediately, and a natural finale for this track. No verified credit claim.