Assistive & Accessible AI · Capstone brief
ACC-09 · IEP / 504 boundary awareness
Write the educator guidance for using AI supports without violating plan accommodations or privacy.
The question
Write the educator guidance for using AI supports without violating plan accommodations or privacy.
Partners / materials
Hypothetical or redacted plan scenarios the teacher supplies — never real student IEP/504 documents from a live caseload in the student packet. Division published AI/student-data rules if available. Guidance aimed at teachers, not a compliance determination.
Expected failure modes
Practicing law or special-ed administration. Using a real student’s plan. Declaring a tool “504 compliant.” Ignoring that accommodations are individualized.
Done looks like
Educator guidance ≤3 pages; scenario walkthroughs; red-line list (what teachers must not do with AI tools); escalation path to case manager/admin; disclaimer that the school decides compliance.
Five C's
CT: support vs plan conflict. CR: scenario-based rules. CO: peer finds a loophole. CM: guidance insert. CZ: the student whose plan would be undermined.
Mentor role
Special-ed teacher or admin adviser reviews red lines. Standing instruction: reject real caseload documents in the student packet. School-supervised.
Rubric calibration
R1: one guidance context. R2: scenarios covered. R3: status-quo accommodation path. R4: privacy/plan risks named. R5: insert-ready. R6: no compliance certificate from a student.
Two ways this goes wrong
(a) Real student plan in the appendix. (b) “The AI is the accommodation.”
Credit lane fit
Lane A immediately. No verified credit claim.