Environment, Energy & Compute · Capstone brief
ENV-08 · Environmental justice overlay
Combine facility proximity with demographic layers; state what correlation is not.
The question
Combine facility proximity with demographic layers; state what correlation is not.
Sources / materials
Public demographic layers and facility locations from public sources. Distance/proximity method written before mapping. Correlation-is-not-causation paragraph required. No door-to-door surveying without school IRB/ethics path.
Expected failure modes
Declaring intent or discrimination from proximity alone. Thin census cells treated as precise. Map aesthetics as argument.
Done looks like
Overlay map; method note; correlation table with counts; explicit non-causal claim list; planning implications phrased carefully.
Five C's
CT: proximity ≠ proof of intent. CR: pre-declared method. CO: peer checks cell sizes. CM: careful implications page. CZ: residents near the facility.
Mentor role
Env or social-studies teacher reviews non-causal language. School-supervised.
Rubric calibration
R1: one facility set, one demographic frame. R2: method reproducible. R3: regional baseline rates. R4: thin cells flagged. R5: implications careful. R6: non-causal list is graded.
Two ways this goes wrong
(a) “The map proves targeting.” (b) Bright colors, no counts.
Credit lane fit
Lane A immediately. No verified credit claim.