Model-in-the-Loop Engineering · Capstone brief
ENG-10 · Standards crosswalk
Can you map your design review to one safety or quality standard clause your mentor recognizes — and state what is not covered by your project?
The question
Can you map your design review to one safety or quality standard clause your mentor recognizes — and state what is not covered by your project?
System / materials
Student picks one clause family (ISO 13849, ISO 9001 design control language, NASA technical brief style, or teacher-supplied rubric). Crosswalk is a table, not a certification claim.
Expected failure modes
Checkbox compliance theater. Claiming ISO certification from a class project.
Done looks like
Two-column crosswalk: project artifact ↔ clause intent, plus a gaps paragraph.
Five C's
CT: fit vs. checkbox. CR: choosing one clause deeply. CO: peer checks mapping. CM: table a mentor signs. CZ: honesty about gaps.
Mentor role
Engineer signs gaps paragraph at Checkpoint 2. School-supervised.
Rubric calibration
R1: one standard family. R2: artifacts cited. R3: before-crosswalk baseline list. R4: gaps honest. R5: mentor-readable. R6: no false certification.
Two ways this goes wrong
(a) Every clause checked “yes.” (b) Standard name-dropped, no artifact link.
Credit lane fit
Lane A immediately. No verified credit claim.