Grades 9–12

College tracks

One project, four years. Pick a track and keep the same inquiry. The done bar each year is something a second person can check. Cryptography aims use the computer science track; the adversary work lands in grade 12.

All seven Mechanical engineering Electrical engineering Computer science Marine biology Pre-med Pre-law PhD on-ramp

Print this page for a paper log. Only PhD on-ramp, grade 12, will print.

Grade 12 this week — PhD on-ramp

Cut the note so a reader can finish it in twenty minutes. Five headings, in this order: question, method, result, limitation, what would change the conclusion. The limitation has to be a way the result could be false. Send it to the person who wrote the grade 11 paragraph.

Log for this week

Type every field (or print and write). Then hand the log to a second person and ask them to rebuild from it alone.

Date.
Five headings present.
Limitation that could make the result false.
Sent to the grade 11 reader (name).

Pass: a second person rebuilds from your log without asking what you meant. Fail: they have to ask, or they cannot get a comparable result — rewrite the log.

Logs also reach hello@contact.schoolhouse.space.

What you send with the application

What you send

The application is this project. By the time you apply, the file has these parts:

Grade 9 — start the project

Grade 9 — start one project

You are on one track. The project lasts four years. This year you start it and keep a log. The log is the start of the file you will send. Do not open a second project.

Every week, do four things inside that project:

Compute a quantity with units, state the uncertainty, and say what decision it supports.
Write one claim, two reasons, and one real objection. About one page.
Read one short original — a figure and its caption, a statute section, a schematic, or a specimen — and write what it says, separate from a summary.
Add to the log.

Finish these rungs on the First Principles ladder. Each one has a gate. The rung is done only when the gate is done.

School courses beside the project: algebra and geometry. Add a lab science if the department you expect to name will examine it.

PhD on-ramp

Write a question and this sentence: “I would drop this question if I saw ___.” Start a log. Another person must be able to carry out the next observation from the log without asking what you meant. The field may stay unnamed this year.

Done when that sentence and a followable method are both in the log.

This week. Write one question you can test with a count, for example whether more of one insect appear at your site after rain. Add the sentence “I would drop this question if three visits showed no difference I could count.” Write the method so a stranger can do the next visit: where, when, what to count, and where to write the number. The field can stay unnamed.

Log for this week. Date. Question. Drop-sentence. Where. When. What to count. Where to write the number. Field (may be blank). Who could do the next visit from this page.

Teacher guide

Grade 9 — teacher guide

One student, one track, one project. Do not assign a second project. The “this week” task in the lesson is the required start, not an example to skip.

Ladder. Rungs 1–8 for every track except pre-law. Pre-law does rung 1 and the memo.

What to cut. Renderings, extra clinical hours, mock-trial travel, and a second app. The log and the done bar in the lesson stay.

Admission. The log is the record. Do not build a separate activities list this year.

Example of a finished week (question is made up; the student must choose their own). Date: 2026-09-12. Question: do more pill bugs appear under the board after rain than on a dry day. Drop-sentence: I would drop this if three visits showed no difference I could count. Method: lift the board with the red-clay brick on the west corner; wet = raining or soil under the board damp; dry = not raining and soil dry; count for 60 seconds; write date / wet-or-dry / count on the index card under the brick. Field: unnamed. Next visit: a stranger following this page. A completed trial lives in content/college-tracks/trials/phd-week-1.md.

Grade 10 — predict, then revise

Same project as grade 9. This year you write the prediction before the next result, and you revise after someone disagrees. The first prediction stays in the log after you revise.

Every week, inside that project:

Predict a number with units, measure it, and write the gap. The first prediction stays visible.
Revise one claim after someone disagrees. Keep the strongest objection.
Annotate one short original. Quote the sentence, line, or feature that does the work, separate from your summary.
Add both results to the log.

Finish Deduction and Proof technique. The field may still be unnamed.

School courses beside the project: advanced algebra and trigonometry, into precalculus. Add chemistry if the department you expect to name will examine it.

PhD on-ramp

Carry out a method that can come out false: a measurement, a close reading, a proof, a dataset, or a build. Write the first result. Update last year’s drop-sentence if the result changed what would make you quit. If the method is a proof, produce a contradiction or an induction on a claim you have not been shown worked, and use the assumption.

Done when the result is written down, not merely planned.

This week. Do the count your grade 9 method describes. Three visits, three numbers in the log. Write whether you would still drop the question for the reason you named last year. If the method is a proof instead of a count, write a contradiction or an induction on a claim nobody has worked for you, and mark the line where the assumption is used.

Log for this week. Visit 1 date and number. Visit 2 date and number. Visit 3 date and number. Still drop the question? If a proof: claim, assumption line, contradiction or induction step.

Teacher guide

Grade 10 — teacher guide

The prediction is written before the measurement or the visit. A revision that hides the first claim is not done. The first claim stays visible.

The “this week” task in the lesson is the required start for that grade.

Ladder.

Rungs 13 and 14. The field may stay unnamed.

What to cut. A new topic that abandons last year’s question. One change between the two results, not a redesign of everything.

Grade 11 — let someone break it

Same project. Someone outside your household tries to break the result. Their paragraph stays in the log. That person is the one who can write the letter.

Before you register for grade 12, write three lines from the course list your desired college publishes: courses you will have finished, courses still missing, and the term you will take each missing one. Add a missing course around the project. Do not drop this track’s mathematics, lab line, or memo to make room for an elective.

Name a department this year. From here, finish the mathematics that department will examine. The rung list below is for the other tracks.

Every week, inside that project:

Use the standard of proof the named department uses on the method already in the log.
Write a timed page a stranger in that field could grade. Answer the other side in the text.
Cite one paper, dataset, or specification that department would recognize. A textbook restatement does not carry the claim.
Put the outside reader's paragraph in the log before you answer it.

School courses beside the project: the mathematics the named department will examine.

PhD on-ramp

Name the department that would examine the method already in the log. Do not switch methods to fit a department you like better. If two departments could claim the method, pick the one that would grade the work you have, not the one with the more famous name. Ask someone in that field, or as close as you can get, to read the method.

Done when they have written a paragraph on how the result could be wrong for a reason you missed, and that paragraph is in the log.

This week. Read the method in the log. Write, at the top, the name of the department that would examine that method. Send the method, not the conclusion, to one person in that field or as close as you can get. When their paragraph arrives, paste it under the method. Do not answer it until it is in the log.

Log for this week. Date. Department name. Who received the method. Their paragraph pasted under the method before any answer.

Teacher guide

Grade 11 — teacher guide

The outside reader is not the household. Their objection goes in the log.

The course-list check happens before grade 12 registration. It does not replace the project or the track’s mathematics, lab line, or memo.

The “this week” task in the lesson is the required start for that grade.

Ladder.

Name the department that would examine the method already in the log. Do not let the student switch methods to fit a preferred department. The ladder phase is the one that department examines, not rungs 19–24 by default.

What to cut. A test designed only to confirm the model. A memo that summarizes authorities and never applies them.

Grade 12 — an artifact a stranger can grade

Same project. The artifact is what a stranger can grade. One reviewer has watched the work long enough to describe it.

Every week, until that note is the one you send:

Use the standard of proof the named department will examine, on the method already in the log.
Keep the claim in a piece a reviewer in that department can check against the sources.
Let a primary source carry the claim. A summary does not.
Write in the log what would change the conclusion.

Finish the rung phase the named department will examine.

School courses beside the project: the sequence the named department expects you to have started.

PhD on-ramp

Write the note a graduate reader can finish in twenty minutes: question, method, result, limitation, and what would change the conclusion. The reader from grade 11 is the person who can write about the work.

Done when the note contains all five parts and the limitation is a way the result could be false.

This week. Cut the note so a reader can finish it in twenty minutes. Five headings, in this order: question, method, result, limitation, what would change the conclusion. The limitation has to be a way the result could be false. Send it to the person who wrote the grade 11 paragraph.

Log for this week. Date. Five headings present. Limitation that could make the result false. Sent to the grade 11 reader (name).

What you send

The application is this project. By the time you apply, the file has these parts:

The grade 12 artifact for your track.
The log, showing the same question across four years and what changed.
A letter from the person outside your household who tried to break the work.
The course record this lesson names: calculus and the lab sequence where your track requires them. Also take the courses your desired college publishes as required. If one of those crowds out the project, add it around the project. Do not drop the lab line or the mathematics line to make room for an elective.
The undergraduate admission test that college requires, on the calendar that college publishes. If your track has a mathematics line, take the test after that mathematics is underway. This is not the medical-school, law-school, or doctoral test, and it is not a substitute for the project.
An essay that states the claim, the best objection, and what the project changed. It is not a list of activities.

What you enroll in

The first year of college keeps the next gate open. Add a course only when it serves that gate.

Once a week, in the hardest course you are in, take one problem the exam could ask. Close the notes. Write the diagram, the equation, or the rule before you look up the solution. Record whether you finished it and where the solution disagreed. That page is the log. A course you only follow in lecture is not done.

PhD on-ramp. The first-year sequence the named department requires for your method. In the first term, take the twenty-minute note to a research meeting. Do not add a second project to look broader.

Through the degree, to the gate

The first year is the start. The gate opens only if the later courses are the same kind of work.

PhD on-ramp. Years one and two are the department’s sequence for the method. By the junior year the note has a result the department recognizes, and the grade 11 reader, or someone in the department who has replaced them, has watched the work long enough to write about it. Doctoral admission is that note plus those courses. A second project does not help.

Teacher guide

Grade 12 — teacher guide

A stranger grades the artifact. One reviewer who has seen the work over time can describe it. That description is the recommendation.

The “this week” task in the lesson is the required start of the grade 12 artifact.

Ladder.

The rung phase the named department examines.

What to cut. Clinical hours, competitions, and polish that crowd out the artifact. Cryptography practice stays on a system the student built. It is not an attack on a live network.

The course line is the one the named department expects, not a default lab sequence.

Back to the field guide